Every category where a model named WorkRamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	2%	18 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	13 of 74	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	48 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	64 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WorkRamp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WorkRamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your goal is to train clients to increase software retention (Customer Success), WorkRamp is the premier choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“WorkRamp is a modern, highly popular choice designed to bridge the gap between internal enablement and external customer academies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“especially customer, partner, or reseller training\u2014WorkRamp or Absorb LMS are often better fits” Perplexity Sonar · Learning management syst · direct prompt · alternative

“WorkRamp — Best for Multi-Audience Training ... Considerations: Higher price point” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning management syst · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkRamp, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkRamp was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS12 of 165Not among the top eight

Absorb LMS9 of 161Not among the top eight

360Learning8 of 161Not among the top eight

Docebo8 of 160Not among the top eight

LearnUpon4 of 161Not among the top eight

Cornerstone OnDemand3 of 160Not among the top eight

LinkedIn Learning2 of 161Not among the top eight

Udemy Business2 of 161Not among the top eight

ProProfs Training Maker2 of 160Not among the top eight

SAP Litmos2 of 160Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkRamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 16 answers that named WorkRamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lmspedia.org6

360learning.com4

cypherlearning.com4

proprofstraining.com4

talentlms.com4

docebo.com3

goskills.com3

learn.g2.com3

techclass.com3

workramp.comYour site3

Thirty-four of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming WorkRamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

lmspedia.org/best-lms-for-mid-market-companies5

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms4

learn.g2.com/best-corporate-lms-software3

workramp.com/blog/best-lms-platforms-for-mid-market-businesses-in-20253

continu.com/software/best-learning-management-system2

cypherlearning.com/blog/business/top-lms-platforms-for-mid-size-companies-streamline-staff2

d2l.com/blog/best-corporate-lms2

d2l.com/blog/lms-for-employee-training2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow WorkRamp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkRamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkRamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkRamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where WorkRamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkRamp, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workramp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.