Every category where a model named WorkJam for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	11 of 96	5%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WorkJam yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WorkJam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative22 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“large enterprises tend to gravitate toward WorkJam, Staffbase, or Firstup for deeper integrations and scalability” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · first choice

“Need one app for scheduling + communication + tasks? → Connecteam or WorkJam” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Connecteam or WorkJam if you also need scheduling and task execution.” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Large enterprise wanting a single source of truth: Staffbase or WorkJam.” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“More enterprise-leaning but works for mid-sized retail/hospitality B2B; quote-based” Grok 4.1 Fast · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkJam, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkJam was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam40 of 489Not among the top eight

Blink39 of 486Not among the top eight

Staffbase37 of 484Not among the top eight

Beekeeper32 of 485Not among the top eight

MangoApps21 of 482Not among the top eight

Firstup20 of 480Not among the top eight

YOOBIC16 of 480Not among the top eight

Flip14 of 481Not among the top eight

Speakap12 of 480Not among the top eight

Workvivo11 of 481Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkJam. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 48 answers that named WorkJam and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com42

changeengine.com28

guideflow.com26

staffbase.com25

joinblink.com23

redeapp.com20

getzelos.com19

crewcheck.io14

getflip.com14

g2.com10

221 of the 221 domain citations in answers naming WorkJam came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mangoapps.com/articles/frontline-communication-platforms-guide30

changeengine.com/articles/frontline-communication-tools27

staffbase.com/blog/frontline-communication-tools23

mangoapps.com/articles/best-frontline-communication-software21

redeapp.com/blog/best-employee-communication-apps-frontline-workers20

getzelos.com/best-frontline-employee-apps19

guideflow.com/blog/frontline-worker-software19

mangoapps.com/articles/best-employee-app-software18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow WorkJam

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkJam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkJam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkJam by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where WorkJam is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkJam, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workjam.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.