AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Beekeeper · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Beekeeper

67Judge labels
6First choices
13Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Frontline employee apps for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Beekeeper →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Beekeeper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience9%3 of 964%24accepted challenger
Internal communications and intranetOnboarding and employee experience0%50 of 790%1under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Beekeeper yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Beekeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash04217
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash11103
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202103
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.511002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels6
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative22 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Beekeeper - a frontline-specific communications platform designed to connect non-desk workers” Llama 4 Maverick · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Blink or Beekeeper if your main problem is frontline communication.” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · first choice
“Beekeeper excels in multilingual support and operational communications” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice
“### 1. Beekeeper (now by LumApps) — Best for frontline workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“giants like Beekeeper or Staffbase often require five-figure annual minimums and custom quotes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Beekeeper, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beekeeper was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
WorkJam32 of 675Not among the top eight
Firstup25 of 670Not among the top eight
Microsoft Teams22 of 671Not among the top eight
YOOBIC18 of 671Not among the top eight
Workvivo17 of 671Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beekeeper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 67 answers that named Beekeeper and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com46
staffbase.com36
redeapp.com34
changeengine.com32
joinblink.com32
getzelos.com24
guideflow.com24
crewcheck.io22
yourco.io16
turnonwork.com15

281 of the 281 domain citations in answers naming Beekeeper came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Beekeeper

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Beekeeper; a claim can dispute any of them.
Beekeeper (LumApps) 2Beekeeper (now part of LumApps) 2Beekeeper (now by LumApps) 1LumApps + Beekeeper 1

Follow Beekeeper

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beekeeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beekeeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beekeeper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Beekeeper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Beekeeper, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beekeeper.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Beekeeper is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Beekeeper is among the products AI models recommend first in Frontline employee apps this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Frontline employee apps, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/frontline-employee-apps/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/beekeeper--frontline-employee-apps-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Frontline employee apps, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Frontline employee apps standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Frontline employee apps, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/frontline-employee-apps/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/beekeeper--frontline-employee-apps-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Frontline employee apps, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Frontline employee apps standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Frontline employee apps, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/frontline-employee-apps/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/beekeeper--frontline-employee-apps-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Frontline employee apps, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Frontline employee apps standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.