HR AI Index

Index › Products › SAP SuccessFactors Time Management · September 2026 Edition

SAP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SAP SuccessFactors Time Management

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP SuccessFactors Time Management was named 1 time in Time and attendance, where UKG Ready led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market42 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 100

under the label threshold

In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Time Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	42 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Time Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Time Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: SAP-anchored enterprises (manufacturing, energy, pharma)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Time Management was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UKG Pro4 of 72Not among the top eight

Workday Time Tracking4 of 71Not among the top eight

Workday3 of 71Not among the top eight

Connecteam3 of 70Not among the top eight

Deputy3 of 70Not among the top eight

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM3 of 70Not among the top eight

ADP Workforce Now2 of 70Not among the top eight

Dayforce2 of 70Not among the top eight

Paycor2 of 70Not among the top eight

Rippling2 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Time Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Time Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

connecteam.com3

gartner.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

selectsoftwarereviews.com3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com3

wifitalents.com3

bestforbusiness.org2

darwinbox.com2

everhour.com2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Time Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

connecteam.com/connecteam-vs-deputy3

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software3

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/enterprise-time-tracking-software3

bestforbusiness.org/time-tracking/10-best-time-tracking-tools-for-enterprise-business2

darwinbox.com/blog/best-workforce-management-software2

everhour.com/blog/enterprise-time-tracking-software2

jibble.io/best-enterprise-time-tracking-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow SAP SuccessFactors Time Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Time Management.

Also from SAP: SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP Fieldglass, SAP Joule, SAP Litmos, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP SuccessFactors / SAP Workforce Management, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation and 19 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Time Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors Time Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SAP SuccessFactors Time Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors Time Management, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.