Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Compensation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	61 of 186	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Compensation yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Compensation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you're already in SAP HCM: SAP SuccessFactors Compensation” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Compensation was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

beqom26 of 2714Not among the top eight

Workday Compensation22 of 2714Not among the top eight

Payscale18 of 271Not among the top eight

CaptivateIQ13 of 272Not among the top eight

HRSoft11 of 270Not among the top eight

Salary.com11 of 270Not among the top eight

Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation10 of 270Not among the top eight

Darwinbox Compensation Management9 of 271Not among the top eight

Xactly8 of 270Not among the top eight

CompLogix7 of 271Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Compensation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Compensation and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com21

darwinbox.com19

comprehensive.io17

bestrecruitingtools.com14

guideflow.com14

captivateiq.com13

learn.g2.com13

g2.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

worldmetrics.org10

143 of the 143 domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Compensation came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software20

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-compensation-management-software-enterprises19

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software17

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software-enterprise-202614

captivateiq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software12

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software12

guideflow.com/blog/compensation-management-software11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compensation-management-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow SAP SuccessFactors Compensation

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Compensation.

Also from SAP: SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP Fieldglass, SAP Joule, SAP Litmos, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP SuccessFactors / SAP Workforce Management, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation Management and 19 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Compensation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors Compensation by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SAP SuccessFactors Compensation is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.