Every category where a model named Workday Time Tracking for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	29 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Time Tracking yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Time Tracking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Global enterprises wanting unified HCM/finance with analytics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Workday-anchored enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Time Tracking, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Time Tracking was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UKG Pro14 of 198Not among the top eight

ADP Workforce Now12 of 190Not among the top eight

Dayforce11 of 190Not among the top eight

Rippling9 of 191Not among the top eight

Connecteam5 of 190Not among the top eight

Replicon4 of 192Not among the top eight

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM4 of 190Not among the top eight

SAP SuccessFactors Time Management4 of 190Not among the top eight

UKG Ready3 of 191Not among the top eight

BambooHR3 of 190Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Time Tracking. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 19 answers that named Workday Time Tracking and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com10

learn.g2.com10

worldmetrics.org10

gitnux.org9

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

selectsoftwarereviews.com8

g2.com7

wifitalents.com7

timetrex.com6

nowsta.com5

Eighty of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Workday Time Tracking came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software9

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software7

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-time-and-attendance-software6

gitnux.org/best/enterprise-time-and-attendance-software5

learn.g2.com/best-time-and-attendance-software5

nowsta.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software-for-enterprises5

techrepublic.com/article/best-time-and-attendance-software5

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/enterprise-time-tracking-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Workday Time Tracking

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Workday is the company behind Workday Time Tracking.

Also from Workday: Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Advanced Compensation, Workday Assistant, Workday Benefits, Workday Compensation, Workday Compensation Management, Workday GO, Workday HCM and 25 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Time Tracking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Time Tracking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Time Tracking by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Workday Time Tracking is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Time Tracking, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.