HR AI Index

Index › Products › Org Chart Studio · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Org Chart Studio

16Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Org Chart Studio was named 8 times in Org charts, where ChartHop led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 74

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 79

under the label threshold

Enterprise39 of 87

under the label threshold

In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Org Chart Studio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	15 of 79	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Org Chart Studio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Org Chart Studio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider the one-time $145 purchase from Org Chart Studio if you need occasional, high-quality exports” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative

“For a large company (>100 employees) on a tight budget: Use Org Chart Studio.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative

“Freemium with pay\u2011per\u2011export | OrgChart Studio” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best Pay-Per-Use Model: Org Chart Studio” Kimi K2 · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Org Chart Studio, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Org Chart Studio was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Organimi15 of 166Not among the top eight

Lucidchart14 of 163Not among the top eight

Creately12 of 161Not among the top eight

Miro10 of 160Not among the top eight

ChartHop9 of 162Not among the top eight

draw.io8 of 163Not among the top eight

OrgChart8 of 161Not among the top eight

Pingboard8 of 160Not among the top eight

Deel5 of 160Not among the top eight

Microsoft Visio5 of 160Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Org Chart Studio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Org Chart Studio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

orgchartstudio.comYour site16

forbes.com11

learn.g2.com10

theorgchart.com9

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

gartner.com7

firsthr.app6

fitsmallbusiness.com6

peerdom.com6

theorg.com5

Sixty-eight of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming Org Chart Studio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

orgchartstudio.com/blog/org-chart-software-comparison12

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software11

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software10

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-org-chart-software8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-org-chart-tools8

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software7

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-free-org-chart-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Org Chart Studio

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Org Chart Studio; a claim can dispute any of them.

Org Chart Studio Free 1OrgChart Studio 1

Follow Org Chart Studio

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Org Chart Studio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Org Chart Studio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Org Chart Studio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Org Chart Studio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Org Chart Studio, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orgchartstudio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.