Every category where a model named OrgChart for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	12%	4 of 79	28%	29	criticized challenger
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	31 of 87	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	0%	58 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OrgChart yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OrgChart across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	3	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	3	1	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2	1	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels3

Paraphrase6 labels3

Comparative22 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained18 labels7

Negative19 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with BambooHR or a specialized tool like OrgChart Pro if you need something more focused on organizational structure visualization” MiniMax M2.5 · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the best org chart software is usually OrgChart if you want the strongest mix of HRIS integration, automated updates, and scalability” GPT-5.4 mini · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice

“For Workforce Planning + People Analytics: Look at ChartHop or OrgChart.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice

“Start by asking for a demo of ChartHop and OrgChart.com.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Starts around $105/month with a 100-employee minimum.” Kimi K2 · Org charts · budget prompt · hard negative

“requires a minimum of 100 employee records and starts at $105/month billed annually, which can be expensive for smaller organizations” Mistral Small · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

“Steep learning curve, not intuitive, complex features requiring coding knowledge, limited customization” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

“Many users report a steep learning curve and find the interface "cumbersome" or "not intuitive."” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OrgChart, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OrgChart was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop58 of 857Compare →

Lucidchart57 of 857Compare →

Microsoft Visio45 of 852Not among the top eight

Pingboard45 of 852Compare →

Organimi38 of 856Compare →

OneDirectory29 of 858Compare →

Miro26 of 850Compare →

SmartDraw23 of 850Not among the top eight

Creately21 of 851Not among the top eight

Ingentis org.manager20 of 850Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OrgChart. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 85 answers that named OrgChart and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

theorgchart.com55

gartner.com47

orgchartstudio.comYour site41

onedirectory.com33

forbes.com31

g2.com31

learn.g2.com30

peoplemanagingpeople.com28

peerdom.com22

wifitalents.com19

296 of the 337 domain citations in answers naming OrgChart came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software45

onedirectory.com/blog/best-org-chart-software32

orgchartstudio.com/blog/org-chart-software-comparison32

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software32

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software31

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software26

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-org-chart-software26

peerdom.com/blog/best-org-chart-software22

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OrgChart

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OrgChart; a claim can dispute any of them.

OrgChart.com 10OrgChart Now 3OrgChart (OrgChart Now / The OrgChart) 1OrgChart (OrgChart.com / OrgChart Now) 1OrgChart (OrgChart.com) 1OrgChart (by OrgChart Pro) 1OrgChart (bybitbucket) 1OrgChart (formerly OrgChart Now) 1OrgChart (specific products) 1OrgChart Pro 1

Follow OrgChart

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OrgChart's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OrgChart, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OrgChart by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where OrgChart is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name OrgChart, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orgchartstudio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.