Every category where a model named Interact for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	21 of 79	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Interact yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Interact across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Offers a well-rounded intranet platform with strong content management... popular with mid-market organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

“Well-suited for mid-market organizations wanting enterprise-grade features without enterprise complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

“Staffbase, and Interact. If you're evaluating, these are the safer starting points” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Interact, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Interact was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Simpplr23 of 305Not among the top eight

LumApps22 of 300Not among the top eight

Staffbase22 of 300Not among the top eight

Unily22 of 300Not among the top eight

Workvivo22 of 300Not among the top eight

Microsoft SharePoint19 of 304Not among the top eight

MangoApps17 of 300Not among the top eight

Happeo12 of 303Not among the top eight

Firstup10 of 300Not among the top eight

Igloo Software10 of 300Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Interact. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Interact and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com24

simpplr.com23

workvivo.com17

oak.com13

learn.g2.com12

joinblink.com10

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

happeo.com8

lumapps.com8

staffbase.com8

No domain is on file for Interact, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms23

mangoapps.com/articles/top-25-intranet-platforms-frontline-desk-workers14

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison14

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-202413

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software12

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms10

joinblink.com/intelligence/top-intranet-software-providers9

axerosolutions.com/blog/best-intranet-software-platforms-compared7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Interact

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Interact's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Interact, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Interact by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Interact is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Interact, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.