AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Igloo Software · September 2026 Edition
Igloo · 1 category · Ranked

Igloo Software

22Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Internal communications for enterprise buyers
Rank 24 of 79 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Igloo Software for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Internal communications and intranetOnboarding and employee experience0%24 of 790%8under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Igloo Software yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Igloo Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top-Rated Alternatives (4.5+): Workvivo, Simpplr, Staffbase, Blink, Unily, Igloo” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · negative prompt · alternative
“consider Igloo as a close runner‑up” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Igloo Software, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Igloo Software was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Simpplr17 of 221Not among the top eight
LumApps17 of 220Not among the top eight
Staffbase17 of 220Not among the top eight
Unily17 of 220Not among the top eight
Workvivo14 of 222Not among the top eight
Microsoft SharePoint13 of 220Not among the top eight
MangoApps12 of 220Not among the top eight
Interact10 of 220Not among the top eight
Firstup8 of 220Not among the top eight
Happeo5 of 221Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Igloo Software. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named Igloo Software and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

simpplr.com18
mangoapps.com14
workvivo.com14
axerosolutions.com7
learn.g2.com7
lumapps.com7
happeo.com6
unily.com6
dev4side.com5
gartner.com5

Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming Igloo Software came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Igloo Software

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Igloo Software; a claim can dispute any of them.
Igloo 7

Follow Igloo Software

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Igloo Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Igloo Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Igloo Software by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Igloo Software is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Igloo Software, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at igloosoftware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack