HR AI Index

Index › Products › Facebook Jobs · September 2026 Edition

Facebook · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Facebook Jobs

10Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Facebook Jobs was named 2 times in Job advertising, where JobTarget led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 94

under the label threshold

Mid-market98 of 109

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Facebook Jobs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	98 of 109	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Facebook Jobs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Facebook Jobs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Scams are commonly carried out through Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, Telegram, LinkedIn, and similar channels” Perplexity Sonar · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative

“they create Facebook pages or LinkedIn profiles to advertise fake opportunities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Facebook Jobs, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Jobs was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Indeed9 of 102Not among the top eight

LinkedIn9 of 101Not among the top eight

ZipRecruiter8 of 102Not among the top eight

Craigslist8 of 100Not among the top eight

Monster6 of 100Not among the top eight

CareerBuilder4 of 100Not among the top eight

Dice3 of 100Not among the top eight

Glassdoor3 of 100Not among the top eight

Handshake3 of 100Not among the top eight

Google for Jobs2 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Facebook Jobs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Facebook Jobs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

joinhomebase.com6

pitchmeai.com6

consumer.ftc.gov4

fitsmallbusiness.com4

reddit.com4

uschamber.com4

easyapply.com3

flexjobs.com3

g2.com3

hrmorning.com3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Facebook Jobs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

joinhomebase.com/blog/best-job-posting-sites-for-employers6

consumer.ftc.gov/articles/job-scams4

uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/job-posting-sites-small-businesses4

easyapply.com/blog/best-job-boards-small-business3

flexjobs.com/blog/post/common-job-search-scams-how-to-protect-yourself-v23

hrmorning.com/articles/bad-job-boards3

money.com/best-job-posting-sites-for-employers3

pandologic.com/employers/recruitment-strategy/biggest-job-ad-sites-arent-always-the-best3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Facebook Jobs

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Facebook Jobs; a claim can dispute any of them.

Facebook 2

Follow Facebook Jobs

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Facebook is the company behind Facebook Jobs.

Also from Facebook: Facebook Groups, Facebook Messenger

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Facebook Jobs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Facebook Jobs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Facebook Jobs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Facebook Jobs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Facebook Jobs, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at facebook.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.