Every category where a model named Wellable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	30%	1 of 98	0%	36	endorsed leader
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	0%	58 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	47 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wellable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wellable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	3	4
Mistral Small	1	1	3	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	1	3	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct30 labels19

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative32 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained30 labels9

Scale-constrained13 labels1

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative111 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Wellable offers the best combination of engagement, flexibility, pricing, and ease of deployment” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice

“Wellable and GoPivot are the top choices due to their scalability, feature sets, and proven track records with mid-market clients” Mistral Small · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice

“Choose Wellable if your main struggle is low engagement/buy-in and you want a fun, gamified interface.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice

“Wellable typically offers the best balance of flexibility and ease for mid-market B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wellable, over the 110 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wellable was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Personify Health53 of 11013Not among the top eight

Headspace38 of 1102Compare →

Wellhub35 of 1103Not among the top eight

Vantage Fit29 of 1104Compare →

YuMuuv26 of 1105Not among the top eight

Avidon Health25 of 1107Not among the top eight

Limeade23 of 1102Not among the top eight

Calm22 of 1102Not among the top eight

Wellness36021 of 1100Not among the top eight

Sprout at Work20 of 1101Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wellable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 110 answers that named Wellable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com69

guideflow.com60

peoplemanagingpeople.com54

avidonhealth.com51

gopivotsolutions.com47

vantagefit.io42

hrtechsaas.com33

deskbreak.app31

g2.com30

firsthr.app28

445 of the 445 domain citations in answers naming Wellable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions69

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software53

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms48

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202638

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms32

avidonhealth.com/hr-people-operations/best-wellness-platform-small-business31

avidonhealth.com/hr-people-operations/employee-wellness-programs-small-business31

deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/corporate-platforms31

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wellable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wellable; a claim can dispute any of them.

Wellable Lite 1

Follow Wellable

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wellable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Wellable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wellable, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellable.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Wellable is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

AI models recommend Wellable first in Employee wellbeing and mental health this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-wellbeing-and-mental-health/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/wellable--employee-wellbeing-and-mental-health-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Employee wellbeing and mental health, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee wellbeing and mental health standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-wellbeing-and-mental-health/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/wellable--employee-wellbeing-and-mental-health-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Employee wellbeing and mental health, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee wellbeing and mental health standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-wellbeing-and-mental-health/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/wellable--employee-wellbeing-and-mental-health-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Employee wellbeing and mental health, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee wellbeing and mental health standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.