Every category where a model named Personify Health for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	17 of 98	16%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Personify Health yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Personify Health across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labels6

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative25 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels5

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“It's best for large enterprises that want wellbeing, health navigation, and health plan administration consolidated into one vendor relationship.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Personify Health if you want the broadest enterprise suite with benefits and navigation included.” Perplexity Sonar · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Enterprise-grade, broad connector ecosystem, comprehensive programs. Best for large organizations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Virgin Pulse/Personify if you need enterprise-scale integration with benefits” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“You cannot afford the heavy administrative overhead of traditional enterprise platforms (like Personify Health)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · soft negative

“enterprise-level pricing and lengthy implementation schedules that can overwhelm mid-sized HR teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · soft negative

“Virgin Pulse: Comprehensive but can be complex” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Personify Health, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Personify Health was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wellable53 of 6713Not among the top eight

Headspace28 of 671Not among the top eight

Wellhub28 of 670Not among the top eight

CoreHealth21 of 672Not among the top eight

Limeade21 of 670Not among the top eight

Wellness36020 of 671Not among the top eight

Calm17 of 671Not among the top eight

Vantage Fit17 of 671Not among the top eight

Lyra Health16 of 673Not among the top eight

Spring Health15 of 672Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Personify Health. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 67 answers that named Personify Health and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com43

gopivotsolutions.com42

gartner.com40

hrtechsaas.com31

peoplemanagingpeople.com27

vantagefit.io22

avidonhealth.com20

deskbreak.app19

firsthr.app18

wellics.com18

280 of the 280 domain citations in answers naming Personify Health came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions40

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software40

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202635

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms30

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms23

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-wellness-software22

deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/corporate-platforms19

wellics.com/blog/top-12-corporate-wellbeing-platforms-2024-buyers-guide-with-pricing18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Personify Health

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Personify Health; a claim can dispute any of them.

Virgin Pulse 4Personify Health (formerly Virgin Pulse) 2Virgin Pulse (now Personify Health) 2Virgin Pulse / Personify Health 1

Follow Personify Health

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Personify Health's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Personify Health, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Personify Health by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Personify Health is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Personify Health, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at personifyhealth.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.