Index › Products › Trello · September 2026 Edition

6 categories · Named, not ranked

Trello

29Judge labels

0First choices

13Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

6Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Trello was named 8 times in Employee onboarding and 5 other categories, where BambooHR led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business70 of 77

under the label threshold

Mid-market45 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise84 of 87

under the label threshold

In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trello for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	45 of 104	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	36 of 60	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	35 of 50	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	57 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	30 of 54	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	76 of 87	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trello yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	3	0	4
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained13 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Visual Approach: Trello ... The free plan is excellent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they lack the depth for headcount modeling, "what-if" scenario planning, and skills gap analysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trello, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trello was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Notion14 of 290Not among the top eight

Asana13 of 291Not among the top eight

BambooHR10 of 291Not among the top eight

Gusto9 of 291Not among the top eight

Monday.com9 of 291Not among the top eight

Google Sheets7 of 291Not among the top eight

Workday7 of 290Not among the top eight

Lattice6 of 290Not among the top eight

Zoho People5 of 294Not among the top eight

ClickUp5 of 292Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trello. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 29 answers that named Trello and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com8

capterra.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

forbes.com4

reddit.com4

effy.ai3

firsthr.app3

gartner.com3

okrstool.com3

selectsoftwarereviews.com3

No domain is on file for Trello, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

bigideasdb.com/software/objectives-and-key-results-okr2

effy.ai/blog/performance-management-software-for-small-business2

firsthr.app/compare/onboarding/employee-onboarding-software2

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-onboarding-software2

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-performance-management-software2

hrinsightslab.com/performance/performance-management-software2

okrstool.com/blog/enterprise-okr-platforms2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-hr-software-for-onboarding2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Trello

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trello by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Trello is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trello, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.