Every category where a model named ClickUp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	2%	15 of 54	27%	11	criticized challenger
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	101 of 104	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	53 of 161	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	64 of 93	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%
HR help desk and case management	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	44 of 92	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26%
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	52 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	45 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ClickUp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ClickUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	2	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	1	3
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase6 labels1

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best All-Rounder: ClickUp ... ClickUp is widely considered the best value-for-money software on the market.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice

“Project Scheduling: Use Asana or ClickUp for general business” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · first choice

“Need visual workflows: Pipefy or ClickUp” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR help desk · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid using your internal tools (like Asana, ClickUp, or Monday) as customer-facing onboarding portals.” Mistral Small · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative

“avoid running customer onboarding through internal PM tools like Monday.com, Asana, ClickUp” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative

“ClickUp's goals module is its weakest link, arguably the worst of all the PM tools tested” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative

“Ambitious "All-in-One" Productivity Schedulers (ClickUp, Akiflow, Routine, etc.)- Why caution: ... request excessive permissions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClickUp, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickUp was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Asana26 of 560Not among the top eight

Monday.com18 of 560Not among the top eight

Weekdone15 of 560Not among the top eight

Notion13 of 561Not among the top eight

Perdoo13 of 561Not among the top eight

Tability10 of 564Not among the top eight

Profit.co10 of 561Not among the top eight

Quantive9 of 561Not among the top eight

Lattice9 of 560Not among the top eight

WorkBoard7 of 561Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickUp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 56 answers that named ClickUp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

guideflow.com14

mooncamp.com13

okrstool.com13

firsthr.app12

clickup.comYour site11

learn.g2.com11

tability.io11

gartner.com10

g2.com9

108 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming ClickUp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software11

okrstool.com/blog/best-okr-software9

gartner.com/reviews/market/okr-software6

guideflow.com/blog/okr-software6

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software6

okrstool.com/blog/okr-software6

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software6

tability.io/odt/articles/best-okr-software-for-enterprise6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ClickUp

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ClickUp; a claim can dispute any of them.

ClickUp's Goals Module 1

Follow ClickUp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickUp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickUp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClickUp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ClickUp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClickUp, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clickup.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.