| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 29% | 1 of 54 | 0% | 44 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tability is built to solve the execution gap. It is highly recommended for Operations, Chiefs of Staff, or business leaders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is Tability, which ranks first in a comparison of 12 tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
“a lightweight dedicated tool (Tability, Weekdone, Mooncamp) is justified; ... Profit.co, Perdoo, Tability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · first choice
“Tability is frequently cited as the best entry point for companies transitioning away from spreadsheets.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 111 answers that named Tability and are not a share of its labels.
376 of the 469 domain citations in answers naming Tability came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tability's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tability, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tability by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tability.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.
AI models recommend Tability first in Goals and OKRs this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.