HR AI Index

Index › Products › SAP SuccessFactors Skills · September 2026 Edition

SAP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SAP SuccessFactors Skills

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP SuccessFactors Skills was named 4 times in Skills intelligence, where TalentGuard led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market99 of 161

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 79

under the label threshold

In skills intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Skills for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	99 of 161	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Skills yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Skills across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the big-ERP-native options (Workday, SAP) are often built for larger enterprises” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Skills intelligence · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Skills, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Skills was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI9 of 93Not among the top eight

Gloat8 of 90Not among the top eight

Workday Skills Cloud8 of 90Not among the top eight

Beamery5 of 90Not among the top eight

TechWolf4 of 92Not among the top eight

Lightcast Open Skills4 of 90Not among the top eight

iMocha3 of 91Not among the top eight

Phenom3 of 90Not among the top eight

TalentGuard3 of 90Not among the top eight

365Talents2 of 91Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Skills. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Skills and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com6

acorn.works4

ovi-me.com4

darwinbox.com3

docebo.com3

f6s.com3

fuel50.com3

skills-base.com3

365talents.com2

blog.talentsforce.io2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Skills came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/skills-intelligence-software5

acorn.works/best/the-8-best-skills-taxonomy-software-in-20264

ovi-me.com/blog/ai-skills-inference-taxonomy-platforms-20264

darwinbox.com/blog/best-skills-management-software3

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/skills-intelligence-platforms3

blog.talentsforce.io/best-talent-intelligence-platform-for-20262

cloudassess.com/blog/best-skills-intelligence-platforms2

dataintelo.com/report/skills-intelligence-platform-market2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP SuccessFactors Skills

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP SuccessFactors Skills; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP SuccessFactors Skills + Joule 1SAP SuccessFactors Skills Management 1

Follow SAP SuccessFactors Skills

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP is the company behind SAP SuccessFactors Skills.

Also from SAP: SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP Fieldglass, SAP Joule, SAP Litmos, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP SuccessFactors / SAP Workforce Management, SAP SuccessFactors Compensation and 19 more

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Skills's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Skills, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP SuccessFactors Skills by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SAP SuccessFactors Skills is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP SuccessFactors Skills, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.