HR AI Index

Index › Products › Quantum Workplace · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Quantum Workplace

11Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quantum Workplace was named 9 times in Employee engagement surv and 1 other category, where Culture Amp led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market8 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In employee engagement surv · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quantum Workplace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	8 of 76	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	0%	32 of 99	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quantum Workplace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quantum Workplace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Look at Culture Amp or Quantum Workplace. These are standard-setting platforms for employee-listening-first strategies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee engagement surv · scale prompt · first choice

“→ Quantum Workplace (strong fit for mid‑market firms that want external validation)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

“High-End Suite: Quantum Workplace ... willing to invest in a higher price point” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for engagement + performance-driven succession: Quantum Workplace” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quantum Workplace, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantum Workplace was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice9 of 113Not among the top eight

15Five8 of 110Not among the top eight

Culture Amp6 of 113Not among the top eight

Leapsome5 of 110Not among the top eight

Workleap Officevibe3 of 110Not among the top eight

UKG Pro2 of 111Not among the top eight

BambooHR2 of 110Not among the top eight

Engagedly2 of 110Not among the top eight

Plum2 of 110Not among the top eight

Teamflect2 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quantum Workplace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Quantum Workplace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apollotechnical.com5

feedbackpulse.com5

betterworks.com3

capterra.com3

cleverx.com3

engagedly.com3

learn.g2.com3

culturemonkey.io2

gartner.com2

guideflow.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Quantum Workplace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-employee-survey-software4

apollotechnical.com/best-employee-engagement-survey-vendors-for-mid-market-hr-teams3

apollotechnical.com/employee-engagement-survey-companies-compared3

cleverx.com/blog/best-employee-survey-tools-in-2026-10-platforms-for-hr-and-people-ops3

engagedly.com/blog/best-employee-engagement-survey-softwares3

betterworks.com/magazine/best-employee-engagement-software2

guideflow.com/blog/talent-review-software2

learn.g2.com/best-performance-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Quantum Workplace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantum Workplace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantum Workplace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quantum Workplace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Quantum Workplace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quantum Workplace, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quantumworkplace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.