Every category where a model named Engagedly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	17%	2 of 99	0%	14	accepted challenger
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	9%	3 of 128	0%	10	accepted challenger
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	20 of 60	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	0%	21 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	18 of 76	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	26 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%
Recognition and rewards	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	31 of 55	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	39 of 161	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	35 of 54	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Engagedly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Engagedly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	3	1	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	1	2	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	2	1	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	0	3
Kimi K2	1	3	2	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2	2	6
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels9

Paraphrase16 labels4

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Engagedly or TalentGuard as top internal mobility platforms, with Engagedly edging out as the primary pick” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For most mid‑market B2B companies, Engagedly, Lattice, Dayforce, or SuccessionStack strike the best balance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice

“Engagedly and Lattice are the strongest starting points due to their integrated platforms and AI-driven features” Mistral Small · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice

“Engagedly and Lattice are recommended for mid-market organizations for succession embedded in performance workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Succession planning · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Engagedly, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Engagedly was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice27 of 635Compare →

TalentGuard18 of 633Compare →

Leapsome15 of 630Not among the top eight

Eightfold AI14 of 632Not among the top eight

Fuel5013 of 633Compare →

Culture Amp13 of 632Not among the top eight

Gloat13 of 632Compare →

Workday13 of 631Not among the top eight

Betterworks12 of 634Not among the top eight

15Five11 of 630Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Engagedly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 63 answers that named Engagedly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

engagedly.comYour site47

talentguard.com21

gartner.com19

guideflow.com18

firsthr.app17

worldmetrics.org17

peoplemanagingpeople.com15

betterworks.com14

workhuman.com14

feedbackpulse.com12

147 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming Engagedly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

engagedly.com/blog/best-succession-planning-softwares17

talentguard.com/blog/10-best-role-readiness-planning-software-for-202514

engagedly.com/blog/best-talent-mobility-softwares12

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software12

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/internal-mobility-platforms10

successionstack.com/best-succession-planning-software10

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools9

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Engagedly

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Engagedly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Engagedly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Engagedly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Engagedly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Engagedly, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at engagedly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Engagedly is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Succession planning

Engagedly is among the products AI models recommend first in Succession planning this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/succession-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/engagedly--succession-planning-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Succession planning, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Succession planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/succession-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/engagedly--succession-planning-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Succession planning, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Succession planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/succession-planning/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/engagedly--succession-planning-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Succession planning, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Succession planning standing, where the claim can be checked.

Internal talent marketplace

Engagedly is among the products AI models recommend first in Internal talent marketplace this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/engagedly--internal-talent-marketplace-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Internal talent marketplace, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Internal talent marketplace standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/engagedly--internal-talent-marketplace-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Internal talent marketplace, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Internal talent marketplace standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/internal-talent-marketplace/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/engagedly--internal-talent-marketplace-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Internal talent marketplace, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Internal talent marketplace standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.