HR AI Index

Index › Products › MentorStack · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

MentorStack

5Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MentorStack was named 2 times in Mentoring software, where Together led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 55

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MentorStack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	0%	21 of 55	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MentorStack yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MentorStack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“free tier for up to 10 participants with no time limit. Good transparent, low-cost option.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative

“MentorStack (Best for Modern UX and AI-assisted Mentoring)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MentorStack, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MentorStack was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Mentorloop5 of 50Not among the top eight

Together5 of 50Not among the top eight

PushFar4 of 52Not among the top eight

MentorcliQ4 of 50Not among the top eight

Mentornity3 of 52Not among the top eight

Chronus3 of 50Not among the top eight

Qooper1 of 50Not among the top eight

Ten Thousand Coffees1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MentorStack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named MentorStack and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com2

guideflow.com2

mentorstack.coYour site2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

qooper.io2

softwareadvice.com2

togetherplatform.com2

adplist.org1

brancher.com.au1

capterra.co.uk1

Fifteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming MentorStack came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-mentoring-software2

softwareadvice.com/mentoring2

togetherplatform.com/2

adplist.org/guides/best-mentorship-platforms1

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software1

capterra.co.uk/software/189739/pushfar1

en.mentornity.com/mentoring-coaching-software-pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow MentorStack

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MentorStack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MentorStack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MentorStack by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where MentorStack is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name MentorStack, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mentorstack.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.