2 categories · RankedTogether
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 37% | 1 of 55 | 5% | 43 | endorsed leader |
| Coaching platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 29 of 116 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Together across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If I had to pick one safe bet for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd start with Together Platform or Mentorgain for a demo.” Kimi K2 · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Together is the best all-around choice due to its mid-market-specific design, transparent flat-rate pricing, strong AI matching” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice
“Together stands out as the most balanced choice due to its AI-driven matching, strong integrations, and proven track record” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Together and Mentorgain are top choices due to their clear pricing, scalability, and focus on the mid-market segment” Mistral Small · Mentoring software · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“While industry giants like Together, Chronus, and MentorcliQ are excellent, their pricing often starts at $5,000 to $12,000+ per year, which is out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
“more premium/custom-priced and usually overkill for tight budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mentoring software · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Together, over the 145 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Together was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 120 of the 145 answers that named Together and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
584 of the 647 domain citations in answers naming Together came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Together
Follow Together
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Together's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Together, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Together by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Together is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Together, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at togetherplatform.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Together is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
AI models recommend Together first in Mentoring software this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.