HR AI Index

Index › Products › Learnerbly · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Learnerbly

7Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Learnerbly was named 2 times in Learning experience plat, where Learn Amp led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business61 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market74 of 79

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Learnerbly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	74 of 79	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Learnerbly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Learnerbly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise LXPs (Degreed, Docebo, Cornerstone, Learnerbly, Skillsoft)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · hard negative

“quote-only enterprise LXPs ... risky for small teams or early-stage budgets” Perplexity Sonar · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Learnerbly, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Learnerbly was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cornerstone OnDemand7 of 70Not among the top eight

Degreed7 of 70Not among the top eight

Docebo7 of 70Not among the top eight

Skillsoft Percipio7 of 70Not among the top eight

Fuel506 of 70Not among the top eight

Udemy Business5 of 70Not among the top eight

GoSkills4 of 74Not among the top eight

360Learning4 of 70Not among the top eight

SC Training4 of 70Not among the top eight

Kajabi2 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Learnerbly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Learnerbly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app7

g2.com6

goskills.com6

group.app4

learnworlds.com3

notsalmon.com3

belitsoft.com2

capterra.com2

digitalhumans.com2

hr.software2

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Learnerbly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/training/lxp-learning-platform7

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms5

firsthr.app/blog/training/learning-experience-platform3

g2.com/categories/learning-experience-platforms-lxp/small-business3

group.app/blog/learning-experience-platforms3

learnworlds.com/blog/business/online-learning-platforms3

notsalmon.com/2026/01/06/4-learning-experience-platforms-for-small-businesses3

belitsoft.com/custom-elearning-development/top-lxp-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Learnerbly

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Learnerbly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Learnerbly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Learnerbly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Learnerbly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Learnerbly, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at learn.studio is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.