AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Clockify · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Clockify

72Judge labels
10First choices
6Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Time and attendance for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Clockify →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Clockify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Time and attendanceCore HR and payroll12%2 of 860%22accepted challenger
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll0%27 of 930%2under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Clockify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Clockify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash12003
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast12104
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K212003
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels2
Comparative18 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels8
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starting with a free solution like Open Time Clock or Clockify can provide professional features without upfront costs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget: Clockify (free, unlimited users) is the safest bet for most small companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“Clockify is the industry standard. The free version is incredibly generous and supports unlimited users.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“Clockify stands out as one of the best time and attendance systems due to its robust free plan” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Clockify, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Clockify was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
QuickBooks Time33 of 721Not among the top eight
Deputy20 of 722Not among the top eight
When I Work20 of 720Not among the top eight
Buddy Punch17 of 721Not among the top eight
Harvest15 of 726Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Clockify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 72 answers that named Clockify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com40
selectsoftwarereviews.com29
peoplemanagingpeople.com26
techrepublic.com26
business.com21
joinhomebase.com21
gartner.com20
timetrex.com19
connecteam.com17
trackingtime.co16

235 of the 235 domain citations in answers naming Clockify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Clockify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Clockify; a claim can dispute any of them.
Clockify / Toggl 1Clockify/Jibble 1

Follow Clockify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Clockify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Clockify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Clockify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Clockify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Clockify, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clockify.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Clockify is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Clockify is among the products AI models recommend first in Time and attendance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Time and attendance, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/core/time-and-attendance/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/clockify--time-and-attendance-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Time and attendance, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Time and attendance standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Time and attendance, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/core/time-and-attendance/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/clockify--time-and-attendance-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Time and attendance, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Time and attendance standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Time and attendance, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/core/time-and-attendance/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/clockify--time-and-attendance-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Time and attendance, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Time and attendance standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.