HR AI Index

Index › Products › ClickTime · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ClickTime

4Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClickTime was named 4 times in Time and attendance, where UKG Ready led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market11 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ClickTime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	4%	11 of 86	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ClickTime yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ClickTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labels2

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid‑sized B2B firms, ClickTime and QuickBooks Time are strong first choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“ClickTime and UKG Ready are excellent choices” Mistral Small · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“ClickTime: Best for deep project budgeting and capacity planning.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative

“Strong Alternative 2: ClickTime” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClickTime, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickTime was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UKG Ready3 of 40Not among the top eight

QuickBooks Time2 of 40Not among the top eight

Rippling1 of 41Not among the top eight

Toggl Track1 of 41Not among the top eight

ADP Workforce Now1 of 40Not among the top eight

BigTime1 of 40Not among the top eight

Celoxis1 of 40Not among the top eight

Clockify1 of 40Not among the top eight

DATABASICS Time1 of 40Not among the top eight

Deputy1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickTime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named ClickTime and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

b2breviews.com3

forbes.com3

learn.g2.com3

wrike.com3

capterra.com2

erpresearch.com2

g2.com2

ordio.com2

sourceforge.net2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming ClickTime came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

b2breviews.com/time-tracking-software3

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-tracking-software3

learn.g2.com/best-time-tracking-software3

wrike.com/blog/best-time-tracking-software-guide3

ordio.com/en/insights/guides/time-tracking-software2

sourceforge.net/software/time-tracking/for-mid-size-business2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/enterprise-time-tracking-software2

actitime.com/software-collections/clicktime-review1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow ClickTime

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickTime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickTime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClickTime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ClickTime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClickTime, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clicktime.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.