HR AI Index

Index › Products › Agendrix · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Agendrix

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Agendrix was named 2 times in Time and attendance and 1 other category, where UKG Ready led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market32 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Agendrix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	32 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	59 of 93	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Agendrix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Agendrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tailored for Canadian labor laws; flexible scheduling.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Agendrix, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agendrix was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Homebase4 of 41Not among the top eight

Deputy4 of 40Not among the top eight

Sling3 of 41Not among the top eight

Connecteam2 of 41Not among the top eight

When I Work2 of 40Not among the top eight

Buddy Punch1 of 40Not among the top eight

Factorial1 of 40Not among the top eight

Findmyshift1 of 40Not among the top eight

Paycom1 of 40Not among the top eight

Planday1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agendrix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Agendrix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

connecteam.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

zapier.com3

forbes.com2

joinhomebase.com2

bestforbusiness.org1

buddypunch.com1

business.com1

community.sap.com1

fitsmallbusiness.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Agendrix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/best-employee-scheduling-software3

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-scheduling-software2

bestforbusiness.org/time-tracking/10-best-time-tracking-tools-for-enterprise-business1

buddypunch.com/blog/employee-scheduling-software1

business.com/categories/employee-scheduling-software1

community.sap.com/t5/additional-blog-posts-by-members/what-s-the-difference-between-time-a1

community.sap.com/t5/additional-blogs-by-members/what-s-the-difference-between-time-and-at1

connecteam.com/best-free-employee-shift-scheduling-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Agendrix

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agendrix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agendrix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Agendrix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Agendrix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Agendrix, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agendrix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.