AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Workday Help · September 2026 Edition
Workday · 1 category · Ranked

Workday Help

21Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in HR help desk for enterprise buyers
Rank 83 of 92 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hr help desk · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workday Help for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
HR help desk and case managementOnboarding and employee experience0%83 of 9250%4under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Help yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Help across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00022
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Workday or Oracle if your HR platform is already there” GPT-5.4 mini · HR help desk · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“rarely a massive enterprise monolith like ServiceNow or Workday Help—which require dedicated development teams and months of implementation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · direct prompt · soft negative
“The Training Paywall: Some giants (like Workday) restrict administrative training behind costly, customer-only certification paths.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Help, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Help was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ServiceNow HR Service Delivery18 of 2114Not among the top eight
Zendesk12 of 210Not among the top eight
Jira Service Management8 of 210Not among the top eight
Freshservice6 of 212Not among the top eight
UKG HR Service Delivery4 of 210Not among the top eight
Applaud3 of 210Not among the top eight
Dovetail Software3 of 210Not among the top eight
HR Acuity3 of 210Not among the top eight
Oracle HR Help Desk3 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Help. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 21 answers that named Workday Help and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

servicenow.com12
featurebase.app8
gitnux.org8
worldmetrics.org8
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
wifitalents.com7
zendesk.com7
guideflow.com6
g2.com5
atlassian.com4

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Workday Help came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday Help

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Help; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday Help / Workday HR service capabilities 1

Follow Workday Help

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Workday is the company behind Workday Help.
Also from Workday
Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Advanced Compensation, Workday Assistant, Workday Benefits, Workday Compensation, Workday Compensation Management, Workday GO, Workday HCM and 25 more
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Help's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Help, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Help by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Workday Help is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Help, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack