Every category where a model named Timetastic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	7%	6 of 89	16%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Timetastic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Timetastic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels4

Paraphrase6 labels3

Comparative18 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels8

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative10 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Often recommended as the best dedicated leave tracker for small businesses and professionals, with affordable pricing.” Mistral Small · Leave · budget prompt · first choice

“With a price point of approximately $1.30 per user, Timetastic is lauded for its cost-effectiveness” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · budget prompt · first choice

“Small teams (<50) that want the simplest, fastest way to manage leave ... Timetastic or LeaveBoard” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Leave · comparative prompt · first choice

“likely to be a dedicated leave tracker such as Timetastic, LeaveBoard, or Vacation Tracker” Llama 4 Maverick · Leave · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“if you are managing a growing business with a need for reporting, payroll prep, and complex policies, this may not be the option for you.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Timetastic may not be suitable for larger companies or those with complex leave policies due to lack of advanced features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · negative prompt · soft negative

“Lighter, cheaper, but fewer features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Leave · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Timetastic, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Timetastic was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vacation Tracker51 of 6610Compare →

BambooHR42 of 664Compare →

LeaveBoard35 of 663Compare →

Calamari25 of 660Not among the top eight

Day Off22 of 663Compare →

Rippling22 of 661Compare →

Workday17 of 662Not among the top eight

Factorial17 of 660Not among the top eight

Gusto16 of 661Not among the top eight

AbsenceSoft13 of 661Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Timetastic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 66 answers that named Timetastic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com44

employsome.com43

forbes.com41

technologyadvice.com30

attendancebot.com23

tracefyhr.com20

connecteam.com19

vacationtracker.io19

actiplans.com18

firsthr.app16

273 of the 273 domain citations in answers naming Timetastic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

employsome.com/best/leave-management-software43

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-leave-management-systems41

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-leave-management-software40

technologyadvice.com/blog/human-resources/leave-management-tools30

tracefyhr.com/blog/best-leave-management-software-small-business-202620

attendancebot.com/blog/8-best-leave-management-software-for-small-businesses-in-202619

articsledge.com/post/leave-management-software14

leapsome.com/blog/absence-management-software14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Timetastic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Timetastic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Timetastic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Timetastic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Timetastic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Timetastic, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at timetastic.co.uk is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.