HR AI Index

Index › Products › Sysarb · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sysarb

18Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sysarb was named 8 times in Pay equity, where Syndio led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business36 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise16 of 52

under the label threshold

In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sysarb for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Pay equity	Compensation and total rewards	5%	7 of 60	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sysarb yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sysarb across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase14 labels2

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Sysarb as the top pay transparency compliance tool for a mid-sized B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: Sysarb (if EU-focused)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Sysarb is another strong option, specifically designed for medium-sized and large European companies” Mistral Small · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Sysarb is the safer recommendation ... best fit for medium-sized and large European companies” Perplexity Sonar · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sysarb, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sysarb was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Trusaic PayParity12 of 183Not among the top eight

beqom10 of 182Not among the top eight

Syndio7 of 185Not among the top eight

Payscale6 of 180Not among the top eight

Ravio5 of 182Not among the top eight

PayAnalytics5 of 181Not among the top eight

Axios Analytics4 of 181Not among the top eight

Compport2 of 181Not among the top eight

Pave2 of 181Not among the top eight

beqom PaySuite2 of 181Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sysarb. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Sysarb and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hr.software13

payanalytics.com13

resources.sysarb.comYour site13

beqom.com10

axiosanalytics.com9

hrtechsaas.com9

compensationtools.net8

guideflow.com8

figures.hr7

gartner.com6

Eighty-three of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Sysarb came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hr.software/best-payroll/pay-transparency-compliance-tools12

payanalytics.com/product/pay-transparency12

resources.sysarb.com/buyers-guides/whats-the-best-eu-pay-transparency-directive-software12

beqom.com/products/pay-equity-and-pay-transparency10

axiosanalytics.com/en/resources/best-eu-pay-transparency-software-20269

guideflow.com/blog/pay-equity-software8

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-pay-transparency-compliance-software8

compensationtools.net/best-pay-transparency-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Sysarb

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sysarb's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sysarb, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sysarb by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Sysarb is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sysarb, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sysarb.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.