AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › PerformYard · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

PerformYard

139Judge labels
13First choices
11Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in 360 feedback for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 28 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PerformYard →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PerformYard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Performance managementPerformance and talent management9%3 of 607%28accepted challenger
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management2%7 of 776%18accepted challenger
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%20 of 990%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PerformYard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PerformYard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.504105
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash16007
Perplexity Sonar12104
Grok 4.1 Fast05409
Mistral Small13105
DeepSeek V4 Flash02327
Llama 4 Maverick00415
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K213004
GLM 4.7 FlashX03407
MiniMax M2.510203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels3
Paraphrase28 labels5
Comparative38 labelsNone
Budget-constrained19 labels2
Scale-constrained18 labels3
Negative17 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative139 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd generally recommend PerformYard first if you want a dedicated, mid-market-friendly multi-rater feedback / 360 review tool” Perplexity Sonar · 360 feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Leaders in this category typically include Lattice, Culture Amp, 15Five, Leapsome, and PerformYard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Performance management · scale prompt · first choice
“I recommend PerformYard as a top performance review tool” Mistral Small · Performance management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My Top Recommendation: PerformYard” MiniMax M2.5 · Performance management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“many tools (Effy AI, Primalogik, PerformYard, 15Five, Lattice) charge for every employee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative
“PerformYard: has limited and complex reporting options.” Llama 4 Maverick · Performance management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Be cautious if you need flexibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Performance management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PerformYard, over the 139 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PerformYard was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR45 of 1394Not among the top eight
Workday29 of 1390Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PerformYard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 119 of the 139 answers that named PerformYard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

betterworks.com66
workhuman.com60
peoplemanagingpeople.com54
forbes.com41
guideflow.com36
effy.ai35
feedbackpulse.com35
g2.com33
firsthr.app31
engagedly.com30

421 of the 421 domain citations in answers naming PerformYard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow PerformYard

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PerformYard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PerformYard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PerformYard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where PerformYard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name PerformYard, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at performyard.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where PerformYard is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

PerformYard is among the products AI models recommend first in Performance management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Performance management, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/performance-management/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/performyard--performance-management-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Performance management, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Performance management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Performance management, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/performance-management/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/performyard--performance-management-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Performance management, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Performance management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Performance management, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/performance/performance-management/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/performyard--performance-management-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Performance management, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Performance management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.