3 categories · RankedmyInterview
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 10% | 3 of 40 | 19% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 56 of 72 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21% |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 79 of 84 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated myInterview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want completely free: Go with myInterview (permanent free tier with real functionality)” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Zero budget / very light hiring: myInterview (free), EasyHire (free).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Spark Hire and myInterview are both highly recommended options” Mistral Small · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: myInterview (Free Forever Tier)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid unsolicited "interview apps" or downloads from LinkedIn/Indeed (e.g., bogus MyInterview or Indeed Interview apps)—these deliver malware.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“it processes facial data, raising privacy and bias concerns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · negative prompt · hard negative
“Medium – Caution on experience | myInterview | Poor mobile experience, technical glitches, perceived as impersonal” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
“some of these platforms utilize "sentiment analysis" and basic AI categorization, which are highly controversial” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as myInterview, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and myInterview was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 47 answers that named myInterview and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
216 of the 216 domain citations in answers naming myInterview came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as myInterview
Follow myInterview
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when myInterview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as myInterview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for myInterview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where myInterview is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name myInterview, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at myinterview.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where myInterview is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
myInterview is among the products AI models recommend first in Video interviewing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.