AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › ModernLoop · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

ModernLoop

71Judge labels
8First choices
16Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Interview scheduling for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ModernLoop →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ModernLoop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition15%2 of 7210%29accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ModernLoop yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ModernLoop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash31015
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.1 Fast22004
Mistral Small03003
DeepSeek V4 Flash12014
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX10113
MiniMax M2.502103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels5
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative24 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels2
Negative16 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ModernLoop is the strongest default choice because it is repeatedly positioned as a mid-market tool with strong automation” Perplexity Sonar · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“The Top Pick: ModernLoop ... widely considered the strongest standalone scheduling tool for mid-market companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“Add ModernLoop (or Calendly for lighter needs) on top — it's the value sweet spot for mid-market.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · first choice
“prioritize tools with panel support like GoodTime alternatives (e.g., candidate.fyi, ModernLoop)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise, quote-only, often thousands per month — avoid these on a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · hard negative
“expensive administrative overkill for small-to-midsize companies (under 100 employees)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“ModernLoop can add friction and slow your process” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ModernLoop, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ModernLoop was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Paradox37 of 710Not among the top eight
YouCanBookMe22 of 712Not among the top eight
VidCruiter17 of 710Not among the top eight
Cal.com14 of 714Not among the top eight
Ashby14 of 710Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ModernLoop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 71 answers that named ModernLoop and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

candidate.fyi47
lever.co40
hiretruffle.com34
cal.com31
metaview.ai28
selectsoftwarereviews.com28
bestrecruitingtools.com26
goodtime.io25
fluentbooking.com21
lunacal.ai19

299 of the 299 domain citations in answers naming ModernLoop came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow ModernLoop

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ModernLoop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ModernLoop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ModernLoop by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ModernLoop is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ModernLoop, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at modernloop.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where ModernLoop is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

ModernLoop is among the products AI models recommend first in Interview scheduling this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of September 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Interview scheduling, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/interview-scheduling/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/modernloop--interview-scheduling-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Interview scheduling, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Interview scheduling standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Interview scheduling, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/interview-scheduling/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/modernloop--interview-scheduling-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Interview scheduling, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Interview scheduling standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Interview scheduling, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/interview-scheduling/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-09/modernloop--interview-scheduling-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Interview scheduling, September 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Interview scheduling standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.