AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › HelpJet · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

HelpJet

7Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HelpJet was named 2 times in HR AI assistants, where Workativ Assistant led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hr ai assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HelpJet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
HR AI assistantsOnboarding and employee experience2%15 of 1190%2under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HelpJet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HelpJet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If it's answering repetitive employee policy questions, choose HelpJet.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR AI assistants · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: Practical, affordable HR support” MiniMax M2.5 · HR AI assistants · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HelpJet, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HelpJet was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gusto5 of 70Not among the top eight
Moveworks4 of 70Not among the top eight
Lattice3 of 72Not among the top eight
Workday Assistant3 of 70Not among the top eight
Leena AI2 of 71Not among the top eight
MeBeBot2 of 71Not among the top eight
Playroll Orbit2 of 71Not among the top eight
ChatGPT2 of 70Not among the top eight
Claude2 of 70Not among the top eight
Factorial2 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HelpJet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named HelpJet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

herothemes.com7
firsthr.app4
sanalabs.com4
g2.com3
gusto.com3
humand.co3
rippling.com3
workativ.com3
aihratlas.com2
business.com2

No domain is on file for HelpJet, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow HelpJet

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HelpJet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HelpJet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HelpJet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where HelpJet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name HelpJet, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.