HR AI Index

Index › Products › ContactMonkey · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ContactMonkey

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ContactMonkey was named 1 time in Internal communications, where Happeo led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market53 of 79

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ContactMonkey for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	53 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ContactMonkey yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ContactMonkey across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ContactMonkey, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContactMonkey was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workvivo3 of 41Not among the top eight

Simpplr3 of 40Not among the top eight

Workshop2 of 41Not among the top eight

Atlassian Confluence2 of 40Not among the top eight

LumApps2 of 40Not among the top eight

Microsoft SharePoint2 of 40Not among the top eight

Oak Engage2 of 40Not among the top eight

Staffbase2 of 40Not among the top eight

FeedbackPulse1 of 41Not among the top eight

Happeo1 of 41Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContactMonkey. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named ContactMonkey and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

oak.com2

agilityportal.io1

atlassian.com1

blog.jostle.me1

clearbox.co.uk1

contactmonkey.comYour site1

culturemonkey.io1

dupple.com1

exoplatform.com1

feedbackpulse.com1

Ten of the eleven domain citations in answers naming ContactMonkey came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

agilityportal.io/blog/why-sharepoint-is-failing-modern-intranets-and-which-no-code-intrane1

atlassian.com/blog/confluence/vs-sharepoint1

blog.jostle.me/blog/sharepoint-alternatives1

clearbox.co.uk/10-worst-practices-for-intranets1

contactmonkey.com/blog/pulse-survey-tool1

culturemonkey.io/employee-engagement/pulse-survey-tools1

dupple.com/learn/best-internal-communications-software1

exoplatform.com/blog/sharepoint-alternatives-for-small-businesses1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow ContactMonkey

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContactMonkey's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContactMonkey, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ContactMonkey by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ContactMonkey is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ContactMonkey, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contactmonkey.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.