HR AI Index

Index › Products › CodeSignal Projects · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CodeSignal Projects

1Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CodeSignal Projects was named 1 time in Technical hiring assessm, where HackerRank led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market36 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CodeSignal Projects for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	36 of 52	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CodeSignal Projects yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CodeSignal Projects across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CodeSignal Projects, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeSignal Projects was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CoderPad1 of 10Not among the top eight

Codility1 of 10Not among the top eight

HackerRank1 of 10Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CodeSignal Projects. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named CodeSignal Projects and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clarity-hire.com1

codesignal.comYour site1

codesubmit.io1

codility.com1

goodfit.so1

hackerrank.com1

incruiter.app1

lever.co1

noon.ai1

pin-com.ghost.io1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming CodeSignal Projects came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clarity-hire.com/blog/how-to-choose-coding-assessment-software1

codesignal.com/blog/5-coding-assessment-platforms-for-your-technical-hiring1

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools1

codility.com/how-to-choose-technical-assessment-platform1

goodfit.so/guides/best-coding-assessment-platforms1

hackerrank.com/writing/best-coding-assessment-tools1

hackerrank.com/writing/enterprise-platforms-for-testing-real-world-development-skills1

incruiter.app/blog/best-coding-assessment-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow CodeSignal Projects

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CodeSignal Projects's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CodeSignal Projects, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CodeSignal Projects by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CodeSignal Projects is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CodeSignal Projects, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at codesignal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.