Every category where a model named Bitrix24 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	2%	13 of 128	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	13 of 79	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	29 of 60	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitrix24 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitrix24 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labels4

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Connecteam or Bitrix24 if under 10 users—they're truly free and feature-rich.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: Bitrix24 (Free Plan)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · first choice

“all-in-one employee intranet and collaboration platform designed for small businesses seeking a cost-effective solution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative

“If you need a bundled CRM at no extra cost, Bitrix24 is the only real all‑in‑one on the list.” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The interface is highly cluttered and can be overwhelming for non-technical employees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitrix24, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitrix24 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam10 of 202Not among the top eight

Microsoft SharePoint8 of 202Not among the top eight

Google Sites5 of 202Not among the top eight

Notion5 of 200Not among the top eight

Zoho Connect5 of 200Not among the top eight

Jostle4 of 201Not among the top eight

HumHub4 of 200Not among the top eight

MyHub Intranet3 of 201Not among the top eight

Atlassian Confluence3 of 200Not among the top eight

Lattice3 of 200Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitrix24. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named Bitrix24 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

guideflow.com10

g2.com8

oak.com8

learn.g2.com7

agilityportal.io6

bitrix24.comYour site5

firsthr.app5

tophrsoftware.com5

getapp.com4

Sixty-four of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Bitrix24 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software8

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software7

agilityportal.io/blog/intranet-solutions-comparison5

oak.com/blog/most-affordable-intranet5

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software4

oak.com/blog/best-small-business-intranet-software-in-20264

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-intranet-software4

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Bitrix24

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bitrix24; a claim can dispute any of them.

Bitrix24 (Free Plan) 1

Follow Bitrix24

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitrix24's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitrix24, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

With a new claim: the vendor brief

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitrix24 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bitrix24 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bitrix24, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitrix24.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.